Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: "goose" <ruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 06:19:10 -0700
Richard Heathfield wrote:
<snipped>
Win32 GUI and the Win32 console, I choose the console every time. It more
or less works, which is nice.
Have you tried msys? It's made my life bearable under windows
Also, it allows you to download a source package (like gcl)
and merely do ./configure && make && make install to produce
(using gcc) a native windows executable without a dll needed
for runtime.
goose,
msys beats cygwin flamewar in the making :-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- References:
- ls lacking a feature?
- From: Bernard Liang
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Phlip
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Bernard Liang
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Mark Triggs
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Willem
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Roger Willcocks
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Phlip
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- ls lacking a feature?
- Prev by Date: Re: STL vector and push_back
- Next by Date: Re: about programmin a new language itself
- Previous by thread: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Next by thread: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Index(es):