Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: "Rob Thorpe" <robert.thorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 08:49:25 -0700
goose wrote:
Richard Heathfield wrote:
<snipped>
Win32 GUI and the Win32 console, I choose the console every time. It more
or less works, which is nice.
Have you tried msys? It's made my life bearable under windows
Also, it allows you to download a source package (like gcl)
and merely do ./configure && make && make install to produce
(using gcc) a native windows executable without a dll needed
for runtime.
Wow, if it can compile GCL on Windows I'm impressed. GCLs makefiles
are weird.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: goose
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- References:
- ls lacking a feature?
- From: Bernard Liang
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Phlip
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Bernard Liang
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Mark Triggs
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Willem
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Roger Willcocks
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Phlip
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: goose
- ls lacking a feature?
- Prev by Date: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Next by Date: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Previous by thread: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Next by thread: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Index(es):