Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steveo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:10:57 +0100
On 30 Jun 2006 06:19:10 -0700
"goose" <ruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
msys beats cygwin flamewar in the making :-)
erm - surely they should be very similar viz this snipped from the
MinGW site:
The POSIX layer used by MSYS is a fork of the 1.3.3 version of Cygwin .
Cygwin is a full POSIX layer and UNIX-like environment for Win32 providing
both server and client utilites.
--
C:>WIN | Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins. | A better way to focus the sun
You lose and Bill collects. | licences available see
| http://www.sohara.org/
.
- References:
- ls lacking a feature?
- From: Bernard Liang
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Phlip
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Bernard Liang
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Mark Triggs
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Willem
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Roger Willcocks
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Phlip
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: goose
- ls lacking a feature?
- Prev by Date: Re: Deleting substrings
- Next by Date: Re: Deleting substrings
- Previous by thread: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Next by thread: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Index(es):