Re: string parsing algorithm
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:47:50 -0400
Robbie Hatley wrote:
About 12 days ago, I'd written in this thread:
I think I'll post the C code for my calculator this evening when
I get home, so you can see what I'm talking about.
But I forgot to do that. And then when I set about doing that, I
found that my program was 110 chars wide (my default for home
programming, because it allows me to write comments in a collumn
down the right-hand side), which is not really suitable for Usenet;
so I had to reformat it to 78-chars-wide.
Actually quite clean, and will probably come through unscathed most
places. However, a couple of tips:
Try to keep usenet line widths under 72. 65 is even better.
This allows things to survive a quote or two.
Don't use // comments. They get fouled on a line wrap.
This is not enough to warrant a resend, but you might keep it in
mind for future things.
--
Chuck F (cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx) (cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE maineline address!
.
- References:
- string parsing algorithm
- From: Thomas Kreuzer
- Re: string parsing algorithm
- From: Robbie Hatley
- string parsing algorithm
- Prev by Date: Re: data structure analysis
- Next by Date: Re: a minor change in text2pdf.c
- Previous by thread: Re: string parsing algorithm
- Next by thread: n00bish question but...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
