Re: Network buffering question
- From: "Alex Fraser" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:33:42 +0100
"Scott McPhillips [MVP]" <org-dot-mvps-at-scottmcp> wrote in message
news:BpOdnTFWYtBFQmnZnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Alex Fraser wrote:
I disagree with Scott's suggestion of a large circular buffer. It is
wasteful of memory and a long time ago I found it to have marginally
lower performance than a simpler approach, which goes something like
this:
Me too:) I suggested a large buffer, not a large circular buffer.
So you did. Sorry!
Alex
.
- References:
- Network buffering question
- From: Till Crueger
- Re: Network buffering question
- From: Alex Fraser
- Re: Network buffering question
- From: Scott McPhillips [MVP]
- Network buffering question
- Prev by Date: Re: How to compute triangle base/altitude intersection
- Next by Date: Re: Fibonacci implementation
- Previous by thread: Re: Network buffering question
- Next by thread: Ramdisk for Win2000 -- Any Vendor Recommendations?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|