Re: Binary Tree On Disk

nkprajapati@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi All,

Currently I am using RWBTreeOnDisk ( Rough Wave Library)
to manage data on disk. But now I want to move to Open Source. Anybody
knows the open source solution of Rough Wave library or RWBTreeOnDisk ?

In addition to what Ben said:

For a stand-alone system, SQLite is very nice, and highly capable:
http://www.sqlite.org/

If you want to graduate to a full fledged database, then PostgreSQL is
very nice:
http://www.postgresql.org/
Also, the grammar is extremely similar to SQLite, so transition from
one to the other is very good.

If you like the OO approach, then another possibility is FastDB:
http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/fastdb.html
It is also a stand-alone design, though it could be used for web
purposes. Both SQLite and FastDB allow only a single writer (and
multiple readers).

FastDB is memory mapped, so I good performance is expected for most
operations.

MonetDB is another memory mapped approach but it has a huge footprint.
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/

HTH

Thanks
Naresh Prajapati

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Binary Tree On Disk
    ... Currently I am using RWBTreeOnDisk ... But now I want to move to Open Source. ... Also, the grammar is extremely similar to SQLite, so transition from ... If you like the OO approach, then another possibility is FastDB: ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Binary Tree On Disk (Rough Wave Library)
    ... Currently I am using RWBTreeOnDisk ... to manage data on disk. ... But now I want to move to Open Source. ... Naresh Prajapati ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)
  • Binary Tree On Disk
    ... Currently I am using RWBTreeOnDisk ... to manage data on disk. ... But now I want to move to Open Source. ... Naresh Prajapati ...
    (comp.programming)