Re: how to test this piece of C code
- From: Randy Howard <randyhoward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:31:40 GMT
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:21:20 -0600, Richard Heathfield wrote
(in article <sOCdnRu3b6LV5W_YRVnyuAA@xxxxxx>):
subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India said:
On Mar 10, 3:27 am, Richard Heathfield <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
subramanian10...@xxxxxxxxx, India said:
I do not understand this. Kindly explain. Does it mean that in real
world applications SIZE_MAX memory won't be asked from malloc/realloc
No, it doesn't mean that.
or there won't be 4GB of input file for testing ?
No, it doesn't mean that, either. It just means that most companies are
unlikely to have a machine containing that much physical RAM.
True enough, unless you happen to be working for a platform vendor or
RAM vendor. I've had access to max-mem configs many times over the
years, most of them while working for hardware manufacturers, not pure
software shops.
--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: how to test this piece of C code
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: how to test this piece of C code
- References:
- how to test this piece of C code
- From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
- Re: how to test this piece of C code
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: how to test this piece of C code
- From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
- Re: how to test this piece of C code
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: how to test this piece of C code
- From: subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India
- Re: how to test this piece of C code
- From: Richard Heathfield
- how to test this piece of C code
- Prev by Date: Re: how to test this piece of C code
- Next by Date: Re: how to test this piece of C code
- Previous by thread: Re: how to test this piece of C code
- Next by thread: Re: how to test this piece of C code
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|