Re: re-posting question from comp.unix.programmer
- From: Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 21:54:15 +0200
Chad <cdalten@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
I'm not too sure if the lack of response was to due
1)The regulars are fed up with me
2)The regulars are too obsessed with the large file thread
3)The question I'm asking is poorly worded.
Lately I've started to look at the source to to some larger *nix
programs. Anyhow, I'm finding out that I'm struggling to understand
the parts that I can make sense out of -(.
We lack too much context. We don't know what domain this program is
about. It could be anything, and the comments could mean anything.
If you cannot tell us what's the program is about, you'll need to read
more of the source and connect the dots to be able to understand what
the comment is about.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
NOTE: The most fundamental particles in this product are held
together by a "gluing" force about which little is currently known
and whose adhesive power can therefore not be permanently
guaranteed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Schools working to overhaul the art of computer programming (The Columbian)
- Next by Date: Re: Schools working to overhaul the art of computer programming (The Columbian)
- Previous by thread: re-posting question from comp.unix.programmer
- Next by thread: Re: re-posting question from comp.unix.programmer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|