Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- From: Jon Harrop <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:34:25 +0100
Ben Pfaff wrote:
No, p += 20 in a 10-element array is also undefined in C89.
So most of Numerical Recipies is actually illegal C because it offsets base
pointers to get Fortran-style 1..n indexing?
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
The OCaml Journal
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_journal/?usenet
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- From: Ben Pfaff
- Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- References:
- Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- From: Gene
- Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- From: Peter J. Holzer
- Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- From: Peter J. Holzer
- Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- From: Ben Pfaff
- Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- Prev by Date: Re: Segmentation fault mysql
- Next by Date: Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|