Re: can anybody please point me to a good simulated annealing C/C++ code?
- From: James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:17:41 -0000
On Jul 23, 10:16 pm, Lionel B <m...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
spaces. I used to research genetic algorithms and can honestly say [dons
flameproof suit...] that I never encountered a search problem for which
the most lovingly crafted GA could outperform a well-tuned simulated
annealer. But be warned, tuning SA parameters for a particular problem is
(in common with many other "general-purpose" search algorithms such as
GAs) something of a "black art".
I've developed a very simple alternative to SA;
principle advantage being that it largely self-tunes.
The problem with SA you mention makes it difficult
for me to test whether my method is easier/better
than SA. It would be nice to have some standard
test suite to make a comparison....
James Dow Allen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: Bignum looses precision too fast?
- Next by Date: ram disk says incorrect function. am i using wrong headers?
- Previous by thread: any suggestions about the book "Introduction To Distributed Algorithms" by Gerard Tel?
- Next by thread: Re: can anybody please point me to a good simulated annealing C/C++ code?
- Index(es):