compilation for portability
Instead of using interpretation for portability like Java, why not
use
compilation? Why not make something like the JRE that simply
compiles
everything into native code before running?
.
Relevant Pages
- Java native code compilation
... I was just reading some stuff on a Java forum about compilation to ... native code. ...
(comp.lang.java.programmer) - Re: What would you like to know about JRuby?
... I often find myself writing jruby scripts in java just ... compilation is basically just a "blob of methods" that are wired up ... public IRubyObject method__1$RUBY$bar; ...
(comp.lang.ruby) - Re: Why not Half Life 3 on Java ?
... I'm not a Java guru, ... > Excelsior JET is able to do reasonable "static" compilation. ... >> and pointers. ... > Only legal operator overloading is the operator overloading defined ...
(comp.games.development.programming.misc) - Re: [SLE] Clearing up the FUD on CLI/Mono
... Static compilation to native code as gcj does it ... native code compilation has optimization ... For all practial purposes and for a sizeable majority of programs, Java ...
(SuSE) - Re: Smalltalk w/o IDE, etc.?
... Java crowd was sometimes along the line of, "sure there's a lot of verbosity in Java, but the IDE will generate all that infrastructure for you". ... Java is a compiled language and Ruby is an interpreted scripting language. ... you'd realize that the programmer is shielded from this fact - compilation is transparent and happens on the fly as you modify the program. ... the relative differences between {Ruby, Smalltalk, Lisp}, I think I'll pursue Lisp first, and then learn Smalltalk afterward. ...
(comp.lang.smalltalk) |
|
