Re: If not .Net then what?
- From: spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 23:16:29 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 28, 10:45 pm, Richard Heathfield <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[F-Us set to c.p]
Kerem Gümrükcü said:
Hi Jim,
for the purpose of creating standalone, single executable apps
No application is standalone, every application has at least
an reference to the kernel dll and maybe to advapi, gdi, netapi
or user api.
Bear in mind that this thread is cross-posted. What you say may well be
true in Windows, but it is not true of all computer systems, and
especially embedded systems, which might be the *only* software running.
Ah yes, embedded systems, the last refuge of the programming
scoundrel, whose code is safely tucked away in a toaster and need
never again be ragged on by females to produce useful results which
those females can paste into their horrible Power Point presentations.
Where sprats can fantasize that they are their own fathers, coding as
I coded for a mainframe in 8K, returning to cowboys and indians.
The pity of it being that all the embedded systems has took ship for
Asia.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: If not .Net then what?
- Next by Date: Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- Previous by thread: Re: If not .Net then what?
- Next by thread: Re: If not .Net then what?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
