Re: If not .Net then what?
- From: Randy Howard <randyhoward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:51:28 GMT
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:59:05 -0600, Randy Howard wrote
(in article <0001HW.C39D388A00821C57F01846D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 01:12:27 -0600, spinoza1111 wrote
(in article
<b1be10c4-fce1-4fd2-911e-a1d6ef3e16b8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
Was it in C by any chance? You do know, I hope, that many C types are
unacceptable security risks.
Which C data types (plural, implied by "many" above) are unacceptable
security risks?
*bumped*
Two passes (at least through this newsgroup, and Nilgie fails to
respond. Maybe it hasn't sync'd yet in BFE, or maybe he just needs a
reminder. I'm keen to learn about the unacceptable data types in C, as
this seems important.
--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw
.
- References:
- Re: If not .Net then what?
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: If not .Net then what?
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: If not .Net then what?
- Prev by Date: Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- Next by Date: Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- Previous by thread: Re: If not .Net then what?
- Next by thread: Re: If not .Net then what?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|