Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:07:43 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 31, 7:12 pm, moi <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:31:25 -0800, spinoza1111 wrote:
Look, mate. C isn't portable, because Brian Kernighan is an honest man,
and he says in a book published this year that Rob Pike's code is C. But
when I put this into the .Net development environment's C++ compiler,
char * becomes sbyte and has to be converted byte by byte to work with a
test harness that uses the String. C is PART of C++, so you are wrong in
your claims that C is portable.
Please repeat that statement in c.l.c and come back here after your
wounds have healed.
Instead of saying things that reveal your own fear of cyberbullying
and abuse, self-concealing your own knowledge or lack thereof, please
tell me where I'm wrong.
The PROBLEM is that people are MORE CONCERNED with wounding and being
wounded than with the joy of coding and sharing, and the dominance of
cyberbullies here has DESTROYED this and other newsgroups as channels
of effective communication and working class solidarity. This may be
deliberate action on the part of intelligence agencies to destroy
labor militancy.
Java is portable. C# is portable as long as there is infrastructure
outside Microsoft.
*insert black T-ford anecdote here*
Gibberish.
AvK
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- References:
- Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- From: moi
- Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- Prev by Date: Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- Next by Date: Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- Previous by thread: Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- Next by thread: Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|