Re: Why I've returned
- From: spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 03:09:45 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 1, 4:40 pm, "Mr. Arnold" <MR. Arn...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"spinoza1111" <spinoza1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6baa9f9c-e896-49b9-8a82-b098feed40ae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<snipped>
The bottom line here is that you can't deal with a lunatic like King Little
Richard. He and his marry band (the posse) are pathetic. He and his posse
make this NG dysfunctional, with abuse with anyone that doesn't believe in
their non-sense. They have poisoned this NG, and the NG is rotten to the
core.
In the thread "Brian Kernighan, Maybe I'm Not Worthy, Maybe I'm Scum",
Richard Heathfield claims to have attained a score of 80% (a mediocre
score for someone who claims world-class expertise in C) but then says
he answered "a tenth" of the questions. As far as I can tell, this
means he's lying.
Please add your contributions to the thread. I am asking Heathfield
and Randy Howard to leave the thread, because I am busy coding a
response to the Kernighan code, and they are wasting my time with
harassment and bullying.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why I've returned
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: Why I've returned
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why I've returned
- References:
- Why I've returned
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: Why I've returned
- From: Mr. Arnold
- Why I've returned
- Prev by Date: Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- Next by Date: Re: Why I've returned
- Previous by thread: Re: Why I've returned
- Next by thread: Re: Why I've returned
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|