Re: Advice to adult victims of cyberbullying

On Jan 4, 1:01 am, Randy Howard <randyhow...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:49:57 -0600, spinoza1111 wrote
(in article
<1624fd82-bb9b-447c-ae39-d8fc48cef...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):





On Jan 3, 11:39 pm, "Stephen Howe" <sjhoweATdialDOTpipexDOTcom> wrote:
All off-topic for comp.programming.
Nothing to do with programming.
Not even meta-questions which are on-topic.

But hatred and professional trashing is always on-topic, isn't it.

There is nothing to say as they are subjective, your perception, completely
arguable and therefore unreal.
Did it happen? Who knows? Who can say?

Blood and glass are on topic.

Would be if you had a programming question on blood like a program measuring
its viscosity you wanted help on.

I don't have any "programming questions" that the authorities here are
qualified to answer.

There are no authorities here, but I'm fairly well convinced that any
"programming question" you could think to ask, somebody here could
answer.

Competent and intelligent people generally are not available here, and
I have no questions to ask you people, save that you, as programmers,
review the code and ask ME questions, and perhaps point out where I am
wrong.


But if you're up to it, review the Kernighan
reply code and feel free to comment on the question, which is being
ignored by the thugs. Does "efficiency" merit addressing byte arrays
misidentified as strings in the outdated and hazardous language C?

You didn't ask that question until now.  

Also, the question is badly formed, because it attempts to corner the
respondent into either endorsing unsupported claims contained within
the question, or disregarding it completely.  Pollsters frequently
employ this same sort of bias, with equally useless results.

You know my opinion and are (just barely) entitled to your own. I
believe I am in the middle of a marvelous proof that C is complete
nonsense, and if you would sit down, zip up, and review the code, your
contributions would be more than welcome.

You have been asked repeatedly to answer questions about your claim
that C has inherently unsafe data types (plural), to which you have
steadfastly failed to reply.  You get angry when others ignore your
questions, yet you do the same to others constantly.

Because of the data smog you have created with your stalking (do you
have a life?) I haven't seen those questions, and its incumbent on you
to repeat them. The problem being that whenever I see your name, or
Richard's, I expect more rhetoric and abuse, so I sigh sometimes, and
move on, hoping at a later date to get back to you, like maybe never.


Don't be surprised when it happens to you.

You remain ever concerned with your old testament morality, of an eye
for an eye.

--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
 who have not got it."  - George Bernard Shaw- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is it very important to know bitwise operator well?
    ... They are used quite a lot in everyday C programming. ... XOR the lowest bit to get the lowest digit of result. ... Repeat with carry + one bit in the next place to get a half result ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard
    ... > Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. ... a large portion of ACM Turing Awards have ... programming language is a minor issue, and even that C is just ... significant" language design. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: [EGN} Please any one suggest me some project ideas
    ... that you know absolutely nothing about programming. ... basis since before Christmas. ... You forgot to repeat "popular". ... > Randy probably hasn't read the code of the only examples, ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: Transferring large files, remote sites, sharing, and links
    ... a remote site to my compuyer? ... provision for adding a remote web site. ... Is there a way he can do that w/o systems programming? ... If it will repeat - and you are the customer/the one receiving the file- ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: C Syntax
    ... |> Why is C syntax so uneasy on the eye? ... and after 50+ years of programming ... FWIW, if you want a computer language that's really "uneasy on the eye", try ...
    (comp.lang.c)