Re: Kernighan and Pike's "Beautiful" Code
- From: Walter Banks <walter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:18:51 -0500
spinoza1111 wrote:
The Pike code takes on my contemporary machine about .6 seconds for
1000000 iterations. The C Sharp code takes about 2.7 seconds.
Can you also provide what was being executed in the 10^6 interations.
How much code coverage actually happened in this benchmark?
w..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kernighan and Pike's "Beautiful" Code
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: Kernighan and Pike's "Beautiful" Code
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: Kernighan and Pike's "Beautiful" Code
- References:
- Kernighan and Pike's "Beautiful" Code
- From: spinoza1111
- Kernighan and Pike's "Beautiful" Code
- Prev by Date: Re: Brian Kernighan, maybe I'm not worthy, maybe I'm scum
- Next by Date: Re: Advice to adult victims of cyberbullying
- Previous by thread: Re: Kernighan and Pike's "Beautiful" Code
- Next by thread: Re: Kernighan and Pike's "Beautiful" Code
- Index(es):
