Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: Randy Howard <randyhoward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:28:48 GMT
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:31:58 -0600, spinoza1111 wrote
(in article
<2d240115-f992-44ad-aa42-9c15d22f169f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
On Jan 11, 1:08 am, Richard Heathfield <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
spinoza1111 said:
<snip>
Almost every review mentions that he's a good writer,
Right. There are many good writers. Being a good writer is a nice-to-have
for a C tutorial writer, but it is not sufficient of itself. A detailed
knowledge of C is also a requirement.
I don't think you have that "detailed knowledge of C" and I believe
Herb has it, because knowing C isn't knowing a standard, it's knowing
both standard and non-standard implementations. C is a praxis.
Correct C means correct praxis. You haven't ever demonstrated it, and
neither has Schildt, frankly. Richard most definitely has and does.
--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- References:
- A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: Stephen Howe
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: spinoza1111
- A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- Prev by Date: Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- Next by Date: Re: Why I've returned
- Previous by thread: Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- Next by thread: Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|