Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:31:49 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 12, 5:01 am, Chris McDonald <ch...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
spinoza1111 <spinoza1...@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
...... like a rat, you refer to
offline documents that none of us have time to verify.
Speaking of verification, I would like to verify your recent claim that
you personally speak for Brian Kernighan, and that he does not read this
newsgroup for the fallacious reasons you have cited.
It is well known that most prestigious people ignore usenet, whether
for posting or even reading, so I inferred the obvious: that Kernighan
does NOT waste his time with people who cannot write and who use this
newsgroup to trash personalities for commercial gain.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: Chris McDonald
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- References:
- A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: Stephen Howe
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- From: Chris McDonald
- A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- Prev by Date: Re: check
- Next by Date: Re: Eiffel
- Previous by thread: Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- Next by thread: Re: A note on computing thugs and coding bums
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|