Re: The annotated annotated annotated C standard
- From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:22:24 +0000
spinoza1111 said:
Here I shall start a review of "The Annotated Annotated C Standard" at
http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/schildt.html, the source of many of the
attacks on Schildt.
I have read your review, and it was not easy to find something positive to
say about it, but I tried anyway, and here's my best attempt so far: your
review adequately demonstrates your level of knowledge of the C language.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The annotated annotated annotated C standard
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: The annotated annotated annotated C standard
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: The annotated annotated annotated C standard
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: The annotated annotated annotated C standard
- References:
- The annotated annotated annotated C standard
- From: spinoza1111
- The annotated annotated annotated C standard
- Prev by Date: Re: Easiest Programming Language For User Interactive Web Pages?
- Next by Date: Re: Herbert Schildt, author of The Complete C++ Reference (NOT C Unleashed) rehabilitated on wikipedia
- Previous by thread: The annotated annotated annotated C standard
- Next by thread: Re: The annotated annotated annotated C standard
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|