Re: The annotated annotated annotated C standard

On Jan 17, 8:31 pm, Richard Heathfield <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
spinoza1111 said:

On Jan 17, 7:10 pm, Richard Heathfield <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>

[...] it seems we can rely on Mr Nilges
to miss the wrong target every time.

...and hit the right target every time

No doubt it pleases you to think so.

<snip>

Malcolm isn't the target because he's not the problem person at this
site.

This Is Not A Site. This Is Usenet. Learn.

You don't see that you type above "to miss the wrong target every
time" which was YOUR error.

If you insist on treating trivial errors and hermeneutics as errors in
your Fundamentalist way, then YOU are responsible for the mess this
site is in, because you and your *** buddies are at the origin of
most of the useless "flame" wars and bullying campaigns occuring here.

You have nothing whatsoever to teach me. Nothing. I've forgotten more
about C than you'll ever learn. Apologize to the people you have
harmed and clear out, or zip up.


--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

.