Re: Petition for the removal or voluntary departure of Richard Heathfield from this newsgroup

On Feb 18, 10:31 am, Mike <m.fee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <8a4eea39-9312-4495-ac23-f9f3bbf47...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, spinoza1...@xxxxxxxxx says...> I am working on testing another version of my overlap-aware mem
swapper and will make that available in the other thread when I have
tested it thoroughly. I know you will examine it with your usual
intelligence.

Did I miss the OO version of the Regexp program you were developing (and were going to post on this group when
complete), or is it still an object in progress?

Mike

It's a work in progress, Mike, but what's the use of posting it here?
People who can't swim will call my kites fantasies: people who can't
get off a barstool will call my climbing "Mount" Stenhouse a fantasy:
people who in corporations aren't in fact entrusted with coding much
of anything will take out their frustration by sniping at code and
theories which they don't have the courage to make themselves.

I'll come back to see if Heathfield is willing to take a sabbatical as
I have requested this evening, but clearly there's not much point in
trying to change the minds of a small and self-selected set who come
here because they've been laughed out of other places.
.