Re: A note on personal corruption as a result of using C

spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

On Feb 19, 2:35 am, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
Please back this up with a link to the message in question.  You will
then be seen to be right.  Simple.  You need to do this because I
can't find it and that makes me think it does not exist.

You have not replied to my message where I link to the message I
*think* you mean and which then explains where I think your
misunderstanding comes from.  All you have to do is say, "no, not that
one, this one" (with a link).

You weren't the one to post a bubble sort with the repeated evaluation
of a strlen() function in the condition: Clive was,

Why not just post the link? I can't find it (and I have tried hard).
I give people the benefit of the doubt, but your repeated refusal to
say which message it is you are referring to, makes me think you are
wrong. Either admit you made a mistake, post the link, or say that
can't find it either. In this last case, you'd better stop going on
about it.

<snip>
These challenges are made dishonestly and to waste my time, because
anyone who needs to can confirm the record. It's not my job to do
people's homework for them,

No. I think you are making this up. I think this only because I
*have* done my homework. Without doing the work, I would not assume
you are making this up. I will continue to think you are making it up
until you post a link, because I have tried very hard to find it.

If you continue to suggest I am being dishonest in asking for such a
link, I will be certain you are making it up. My confusion is honest:
you say Clive wrote a C sort with strlen in a for loop and I don't
think he wrote any such thing but, of course, I could be wrong. Just
show me where.

--
Ben.
.