Re: strlen(), K+1: clarification
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:25:24 -0500
Richard Heathfield wrote:
.... snip ...
Unlike the rest of us, Mr Nilges seems to think that reacting to
one's own error by saying "oops, I was wrong" is a Bad Thing.
Either that, or he still doesn't realise he was wrong, even
though the whole matter has been explained to him in words of
very few syllables, very many times. His capacity for learning
is quite astonishing.
If you change 'capacity for' to 'resistance to' I can agree.
However, I can remember some six to eight year olds in my school
days who had a higher resistance.
--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: strlen(), K+1: clarification
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: strlen(), K+1: clarification
- References:
- strlen(), K+1: clarification
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: strlen(), K+1: clarification
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: strlen(), K+1: clarification
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: strlen(), K+1: clarification
- From: Alan Morgan
- Re: strlen(), K+1: clarification
- From: Richard Heathfield
- strlen(), K+1: clarification
- Prev by Date: Re: strlen(), K+1: clarification
- Next by Date: Re: Bugs/Loc in C v C++? (was: Petition for the removal or voluntary departure of Richard Heathfield from this newsgroup)
- Previous by thread: Re: strlen(), K+1: clarification
- Next by thread: Re: strlen(), K+1: clarification
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
