Re: EXE at server
- From: santosh <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:10:48 +0530
CBFalconer wrote:
Jack Klein wrote:
Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
sb5309@xxxxxxxxx said:
There is an EXE file on a web server (assumed to be a linux
binary).
Er, it's unlikely to be a Linux binary if it's an EXE file. EXE
is a CP/M, MS-DOS, and now Win32 executable file format.
Getting senile, Richard? CP/M-80, at one time the world's most
widely used operating system, used a .com extension. CP/M-86
used .cmd.
Gettng senile, Jack? Linux executable binaries normally have no
extension, and are made executable by a file characteristic. EXE
is a MS-DOS and Winders executable format.
How does this correct what Jack wrote?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: EXE at server
- From: Willem
- Re: EXE at server
- References:
- EXE at server
- From: sb5309
- Re: EXE at server
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: EXE at server
- From: Jack Klein
- Re: EXE at server
- From: CBFalconer
- EXE at server
- Prev by Date: Re: EXE at server
- Next by Date: Re: EXE at server
- Previous by thread: Re: EXE at server
- Next by thread: Re: EXE at server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|