Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:52:19 +0000
Randy Howard said:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:38:00 -0600, spinoza1111 wrote
(in article
<1229a74c-a147-49eb-b6fd-b709f3b752a0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
<snip>
You might want to ponder this fact, because I've also
used the legal system, with equal success, in similar situations.
Yeah, I'm still waiting. When can I expect you to actually /do/ it?
I invite you to consider the equivocal nature of the phrase "with equal
success". :-)
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- References:
- The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- From: Stephen Howe
- Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- From: user923005
- Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- From: Randy Howard
- The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- Prev by Date: Re: strlen(), K+1: clarification
- Next by Date: Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- Previous by thread: Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- Next by thread: Re: The annotated, annotated, annotated C standard continued
- Index(es):