Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- From: lawrence.jones@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:39:25 -0400
Bruce C. Baker <bcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Perhaps I should have said "more modern /languages/.", i.e., ones with less
baroque syntax! :-)
At least you called it baroque and not broke! :-)
-Larry Jones
Fortunately, that was our plan from the start. -- Calvin
.
- References:
- Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- From: Bruce C. Baker
- Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- From: Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- From: Bartc
- Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- From: Bartc
- Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- From: Bruce C. Baker
- Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- From: lawrence . jones
- Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- From: Bruce C. Baker
- Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- Prev by Date: Re: "STL from the Ground Up"
- Next by Date: Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- Previous by thread: Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- Next by thread: Re: The "spinoza" programming language
- Index(es):