Re: spinoza programming language status report
- From: spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 31, 1:52 am, Walter Banks <wal...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
spinoza1111wrote:
Last month I said I would be silent for a while and work on a new
programming language, called spinoza. I promised an xmlParser
component by March 30 (today), a number component by April 10 and the
language itself by April 30.
I am testing the parser. It is cool but not ready for prime time, and
will be so, hopefully, April 7. This shall push back the other
deadlines, of course, and I will revise these on April 7 or when the
xmlParser is ready.
The xmlParser to be worthwhile has what I think are unique features.
Parser objects, for example, are thoroughly compareable because
spinoza source programs need to be compared as trees.
I shall be available in this newsgroup today and tomorrow (March 31)
only to banter with my many fans here (ha!) and answer questions,
within reason.
7 days slip on a 18 day schedule with a suggestion there may be more.
Sure. I have a real job and a life. I grab unpredictable scraps of
time in which to do this work.
I am testing the xmlParser. Others thought I should have made it an
abstract class and used an existing parser. I don't like any xml
parsers.
The Korporate programming world continually factors any sense of
independent skill with time to market in such a way as to eliminate
programming skill. Spirits wounded by this factorization, which
destroys the sense of independence that adults seek in any but an
unskilled job, crawl here but are discouraged by bullying from forming
a new conversation in which human solidarity replaces Korporate anti-
solidarity, because bullying exposes their feared inadequacy as
males.
w..- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- References:
- spinoza programming language status report
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report
- From: Walter Banks
- spinoza programming language status report
- Prev by Date: Re: Question concerning object-oriented programming
- Next by Date: Re: spinoza programming language and big numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: spinoza programming language status report
- Next by thread: Parallel building/compiling
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|