Re: Programming to Beat the Odds in Gaming


"Nathaniel Calloway" <ntc6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uk5igp0gl.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Rickey" <rickey.brooks@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

I am a person with limited programming skills. Professionally, I work as
a
government engineer. Since my programming skills are limited, I am
seeking
to partner with someone who possesses advanced programming skills in
order
to develop a method for consistently beating the casino in a perfectly
legal
way.

I've designed the program which you desire. It took me 6 hours, but
it's done. The hardest part was calculating the physics of how the
ball interacts with the spinning wheel. I then ran over 100,000
simulations over the next 5 hours. These are my results:

Number Probability (% rounded to 3 sig fig)
0 2.70
1 2.70
2 2.70
3 2.70
4 2.70
5 2.70
6 2.70
7 2.70
8 2.70
9 2.70
10 2.70
11 2.70
12 2.70
13 2.70
14 2.70
15 2.70
16 2.70
17 2.70
19 2.70
20 2.70
21 2.70
22 2.70
23 2.70
24 2.70
25 2.70
26 2.70
27 2.70
28 2.70
29 2.70
30 2.70
31 2.70
32 2.70
33 2.70
34 2.70
35 2.70
36 2.70

You can calculate the probability of red for instance by adding up the
probability of all the red numbers. Let me know when you chash in so
we can share the winnings, partner.

-Nat


What you refer to as your 'design' is not what I am looking for. What you
have is a series of statistical results, all of which look the same. What
happened to 00? But that must have been 2.70 as well.

The type of program I am seeking is based on the programs I have already
written and shown on,
http://www.lauxes-productions.com/100_Programs/Programs.html

I offered no specifics as to what type of program I am looking to an expert
to write because I had no idea if this thread would aquire any responses at
all. There have been several responses. Thus I should go ahead and expand on
just what it is I am looking for.

I can use any of my programs which simulate real world roulette to win
money. Sometimes the resulting winnings are in the thousands of dollars.
However, more often than not, I end up winning less money that I have
wagered.

Let's say one round consists of my playing until I run out of my seed money.

My betting pattern could be to bet only on Red. Or, I could bet on only
Black.

Obviously, not all results will be Red only, and not all results will be
Black only. Consequently, I am thinking that I should bet on Red some of the
time and bet on Black some of the time.

One thing I have tried is the simple zig-zag method, betting every other
time on Red and every other time on Black. In doing so, over the long run my
results were more promising than in betting straight Red or straight Black.
But the results were far enough from promising to make me want to do a
simple zig-zag each and every time. In the end, the goal is to find what the
pattern is which works best.

It is not important to try and win a thousand dollars each round. Indeed, it
is quite impossible to win each round.

What the program should do is examine how rapidly I bust each round over,
let's say, 50 rounds. It may see I am losing on average $500 each round.

Being the smart program it should be, it would think of a way to alter its
betting pattern and decrease that average loss from $500/round to
$400/round, and then $300/round, and so forth.

Using my programs, there is no way for me to run 50 rounds at a time. After
5 rounds, I am tired. After 10 rounds, I am exhaused, because there is far
to much clicking of the mouse. All the mouse clicking I am doing should be
rolled up into one self-running game which all I need do is click the
start-game button.

The type of results I am looking for would say something like:

Bet on Black
Bet on Black
Bet on Red
Bet on Black
Bet on Red
Bet on Red
Bet on Red
Bet on Red
Bet on Black
Bet on Red
Skip next Bet
Bet on Black
Bet on Black
Skip next Bet
Bet on Black
Bet on Black
Repeat the above sequence

If you can come up with winable result based on some solid pattern, then you
& I should talk more.


.

Quantcast