Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Mike <m.fee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 13:46:47 +1200
In article <9c6a93bb-0c07-4a2e-9f7d-260b48c859d2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, spinoza1111@xxxxxxxxx says...
On May 9, 5:48 pm, Qwertyioup <Qwertyi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:....
On Thu, 8 May 2008 11:56:35 -0700 (PDT), spinoza1111
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Spinoza1111>
"This user has been blocked indefinitely because they have used one or
more accounts abusively."
Yes. That occured last year. I was adding content on Kant, being the
only content provider, it appeared to me at the time, that had
actually read Kant, and I was being encouraged to do so by a professor
of philosophy.
You _thought_ the professor was encouraging you...but maybe the *** was just setting you up!
Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Qwertyioup
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- Prev by Date: A site for all your programming language needs
- Next by Date: hai friends
- Previous by thread: Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- Next by thread: Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- Index(es):