Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)

On May 12, 9:46 am, Mike <m.fee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <9c6a93bb-0c07-4a2e-9f7d-260b48c85...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, spinoza1...@xxxxxxxxx says...

On May 9, 5:48 pm, Qwertyioup <Qwertyi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2008 11:56:35 -0700 (PDT),spinoza1111
...
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Spinoza1111>
"This user has been blocked indefinitely because they have used one or
more accounts abusively."

Yes. That occured last year. I was adding content on Kant, being the
only content provider, it appeared to me at the time, that had
actually read Kant, and I was being encouraged to do so by a professor
of philosophy.

You _thought_ the professor was encouraging you...but maybe the *** was just setting you up!

Perhaps. If that's the case, if there are no adults at wikipedia (and
this may be the case), then it needs to be shut down.

Mike

.