Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 13:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
On May 17, 1:05 am, Richard Heathfield <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
spinoza1111said:
<snip>
You really don't belong in this group, since you've just demonstrated
an inability to master a simple algorithm.
You've demonstrated that same inability yourself. Therefore, either your
claim is incorrect or you don't belong in this group either.
I'd be careful with that, Mister AndOrAndOrAndOrAnd.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- References:
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Qwertyioup
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Qwertyioup
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- Prev by Date: Re: The spinoza papers: towards a theory of progress reporting
- Next by Date: Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- Previous by thread: Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- Next by thread: Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading