Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 20:27:34 +0000
spinoza1111 said:
On May 17, 1:05 am, Richard Heathfield <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
spinoza1111said:
<snip>
You really don't belong in this group, since you've just demonstrated
an inability to master a simple algorithm.
You've demonstrated that same inability yourself. Therefore, either your
claim is incorrect or you don't belong in this group either.
You've got a stalker in this newsgroup who might engage my physical
safety
How, precisely, does one "engage" physical safety? Do you mean "endanger"?
If so, take it up with the police, if you aren't too embarrassed to
suggest to them that you might be endangered because some guy on Usenet
argues with you occasionally.
because he's local, and he's not qualified to post on
programming. You're always yapping about the rules, but as a bully and
a coward, you're doing nothing about the stalker.
*Everyone* is free to post here - even you. This "qwertyuiop" character is
doing far less damage to this group than you are. If you pay no attention
to the rules, why should he? What makes you so special that you can use
this newsgroup as your personal toilet, and yet attempt to deny others the
right to post here?
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Qwertyioup
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Qwertyioup
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- Prev by Date: Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- Next by Date: I can´t compile this code
- Previous by thread: Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- Next by thread: Re: spinoza programming language status report (or, disruptive technology is always late)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|