Re: simple transport protocol
- From: Willem <willem@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 06:18:53 +0000 (UTC)
Roman wrote:
) Hello, Willem!
) You wrote on Sun, 25 May 2008 09:53:23 +0000 (UTC):
)
) W> Well it depends on the type of checksum. But here's a simple example:
) W> Suppose the checksum is a simple sum modulo 256.
) Some misunderstanding of terms: you sum up the values to be transmitted and
) then apply operation of module 256? It means 'sum % 256' in C language for
) example, but according to your example what you do is: '256 - sum'
What I do _is_ sum % 256. Read it again, more carefully.
SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: simple transport protocol
- From: Roman Mashak
- Re: simple transport protocol
- References:
- simple transport protocol
- From: Roman Mashak
- Re: simple transport protocol
- From: Willem
- Re: simple transport protocol
- From: Roman Mashak
- Re: simple transport protocol
- From: Willem
- Re: simple transport protocol
- From: Roman Mashak
- simple transport protocol
- Prev by Date: Re: The spinoza papers: design of the extra-precision number object 2
- Next by Date: Re: The spinoza papers: design of the extra-precision number object 2
- Previous by thread: Re: simple transport protocol
- Next by thread: Re: simple transport protocol
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|