Re: searching for missing element in an array
- From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 04:25:42 +0000
user923005 said:
On May 29, 4:45 pm, CBFalconer <cbfalco...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
user923005 wrote:
rossum <rossu...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
The difference is the missing number.
What happens if you have some number twice? e.g.: 1,2,2,4,5
What happens if the array was initialized to all -1 values? Do
we know that a zero is stored in the slot of the missing number?
Read the first paragraph quoted, the original statement of the
problem.
The original problem statement makes not statement about the
initialization of the array. In no place does it say that all the
initial entries are zero.
On this occasion, I recommend (and I must admit that this comes as a
surprise) that you listen to Chuck. The original problem statement
nullifies your objections completely. Here it is again:
"Suppose we have n numbers(from 1 to n) and there is an array of size
n-1. How can we find, which number is missing from the array if
numbers 1 to n are being placed in array randomly."
From the phrase "which number is missing" we deduce that precisely onenumber is missing. If duplicates were allowed (and also if "number" were
allowed to include non-integers, which I mention only in an attempt at
completeness), more than one number might be missing. Since it is known
that precisely one number is missing, we deduce that duplicates are not
allowed. Furthermore, because we know that only one number is missing and
there are n numbers (all in the range 1 to n) originally, we know that
there are n-1 numbers present. Since the array has size n-1, we can
legitimately and correctly deduce that it is entirely populated with n-1
unique numbers in the range 1 to n.
"The trick" is therefore guaranteed to work provided only that n(n-1)/2
does not exceed the maximum possible value for a number on the host
system.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: searching for missing element in an array
- From: user923005
- Re: searching for missing element in an array
- From: Richard Harter
- Re: searching for missing element in an array
- From: Richard Harter
- Re: searching for missing element in an array
- From: Willem
- Re: searching for missing element in an array
- References:
- searching for missing element in an array
- From: srk
- Re: searching for missing element in an array
- From: rossum
- Re: searching for missing element in an array
- From: user923005
- Re: searching for missing element in an array
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: searching for missing element in an array
- From: user923005
- searching for missing element in an array
- Prev by Date: Re: searching for missing element in an array
- Next by Date: Re: In-place algorithm
- Previous by thread: Re: searching for missing element in an array
- Next by thread: Re: searching for missing element in an array
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|