Re: Program compression
- From: "Alf P. Steinbach" <alfps@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:44:13 +0200
* Jon Harrop:
Robert Maas, http://tinyurl.com/uh3t wrote:So anyway, whether concurrent GC is worth the trouble or not, is
debatable.
If you have >1 core, it is not debateable.
This seems to be a misconception. Having GC run on its own core is only "free" (not quoting you) for a single-threaded program running in a single-tasking operating system. It seems to be the same kind of misconception that generated the SPARC register "window" system to avoid going to main memory for stack -- where end result is just more overhead for thread and process context switches.
Not that GC on own core isn't nice.
It's just not free, and not not debatable. ;-)
Cheers,
- Alf
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
.
- References:
- Re: Program compression
- From: Robert Maas, http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: Program compression
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Program compression
- Prev by Date: Re: Program compression
- Next by Date: Re: square root sqrt algorithm and flowchart
- Previous by thread: Re: Program compression
- Next by thread: Re: Program compression
- Index(es):