Re: machine figure
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:53:00 -0400
Richard Heathfield wrote:
mcjason said:
a piece always becomes a pair with the piece it moves to.
no matter how many pairs, there's only one answer to how a
piece can move.
Is it because many pairs there's only one answer to how a piece
can move that you came to me?
I think the count of pairs is indeterminate. This makes piece move
options either infinite or zero. If you piece all this together
let us know.
"The mere formulation of a problem is far more often essential
than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical
or experimental skill. To raise new questions, new possibilities,
to regard old problems from a new angle requires creative
imagination and and marks real advances in science."
-- Albert Einstein
--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: machine figure
- From: mcjason
- Re: machine figure
- References:
- machine figure
- From: mcjason
- Re: machine figure
- From: Richard Heathfield
- machine figure
- Prev by Date: Re: Algorithm or method for finding maximum of a long polynomial
- Next by Date: Re: Is Message passing good approach for multi-threaded applications?
- Previous by thread: Re: machine figure
- Next by thread: Re: machine figure
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
