Re: core features and functions required in modern programming languages

From: gremnebulin <peterdjones@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:10:02 -0700 (PDT)

On 27 Jul, 23:08, Casey Hawthorne <caseyhHAMMER_T...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

The language features wanted would depend on problem domain.

Or can you have enough extensibility to cope with any any domain? How
about extensibility
of syntax, or user-defined levels of type cehcking, two features that
are rarely implemented in current
languages?
.

References:
- core features and functions required in modern programming languages
  - From: Neil Morris
- Re: core features and functions required in modern programming languages
  - From: Casey Hawthorne

Prev by Date: Re: Simple Graphics Coding
Next by Date: Re: Simple Graphics Coding
Previous by thread: Re: core features and functions required in modern programming languages
Next by thread: 16-bit value in 3 bytes?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: The Language I want
... You mention generics and templates. ... a programming language instead of just adding new features. ... should take extensibility as the most basic feature. ...
(comp.lang.misc)
Re: The Language I want
... a programming language instead of just adding new features. ... should take extensibility as the most basic feature. ... I think that language construction should undergo a process similar to ... many basic language features, which are indeed orthogonal or, maybe, ...
(comp.lang.misc)