Re: win32api
- From: pjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
- Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:19:49 +0200
"cr88192" <cr88192@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
some recent ideas have also related to trying to partially bridge the gap
between human and machine languages. basically, trying to make a
"formalized" English grammar and semantics which can be mapped more or less
to programming structures (note, the idea is to make the program use
english-like structure and semantics, along with "deductive reasoning" and
similar features, and not just some ugly hack for trying to make an
"English-like" scripting language...). the hard part, however, is not the
grammar or the lexicon (I have already specified a basic grammar and
similar, and the lexicon is mostly just a matter of words), rather it is the
semantics (me considering at this point a possible hybrid of an AST and
heuristics approach, along with mapping things to a specialized object model
with most of the "back-end" machinery being done via conventional scripting,
but the details may change somewhat).
http://www.primidi.com/2005/03/24.html
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
The world will now reboot. don't bother saving your artefacts.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: win32api
- From: cr88192
- Re: win32api
- References:
- win32api
- From: Bill Cunningham
- Re: win32api
- From: Anders Karlsson
- Re: win32api
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: win32api
- From: cr88192
- win32api
- Prev by Date: Re: win32api
- Next by Date: Re: win32api
- Previous by thread: Re: win32api
- Next by thread: Re: win32api
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|