Re: Red-black trees?
- From: Ben Pfaff <blp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:19:12 -0800
CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
You are misunderstanding the O notation, which doesn't get
altered by the occasional slower operation.
No, you are confusing worst-case complexity with amortized
complexity. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amortized_analysis
for an overview.
Basically:
* Worst-case complexity is the maximum complexity of any
given operation. This is O(n) for insertion into a
hash table that reorganizes itself, since in the worst
case an insertion takes roughly n steps.
* Amortized complexity is the maximum complexity of a
series of operations, divided by the number of
operations. This is O(1) for a well-designed hash
table.
--
"A computer is a state machine.
Threads are for people who cant [sic] program state machines."
--Alan Cox
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Red-black trees?
- References:
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Red-black trees?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Red-black trees?
- Prev by Date: What is Complexity?
- Next by Date: Re: Red-black trees?
- Previous by thread: Re: Red-black trees?
- Next by thread: Re: Red-black trees?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|