Re: sorting of records with 0 and 1.

"rossum" <rossum48@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:qeaok4pqmsre1k3cfua1ctuv355c67qbhr@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:39:02 +0100, "Harold Aptroot"
<harold.aptroot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hm yes I know, I "designed" it that way. My thought was that it doesn't
matter, it only matters if you want the sort to be stable, but it would
still be sorted correctly.. right?
The OP specified a stable sort so it would not be OK in this case.


Ah missed that.. proof that going without sleep for 30 hours is not a good idea