Re: WHATWG and HTML: brain dead idea?

On 01/21/11 10:01 AM, Rui Maciel wrote:
It appears that the folks from WHATWG are trying to derrail the web.
Recently, it has been proposed[1] that the world to abandon web standards
in favour of a free-for-all, loose definition of HTML that no one knows
exactly what it is and therefore it is impossible to correctly implement
it. In practice it means that only the features provided by the most
popular browser means something, similar to how things were in the
primordial times of the web, with all those "optimized for IE5.0" sites.

So, what are your views on this "HTML as a living standard" thing?

It is undoubtedly an inevitable result of a combination of the cumbersome standardisation process and the (over)ambitious scope of the specification.

The technology is simply evolving too fast for the process to keep up.

Ian Collins

Relevant Pages

  • Re: homepagedesign
    ... HTML 4 and CSS as being fairly new. ... Screen readers and renderers outnumber you ... You can only follow what the standards define. ...
  • Re: doctype for frontpage; other posts not helpful
    ... Actually, Jim, HTMl standards are something relatively new, and Microsoft, ... like Netscape and other browser and HTML development software vendors, ...
  • Re: Newbie: XML to XHTML, browsing subsets of the data at a time?
    ... accepting XHTML these days. ... Excuses are for small businesses anyway. ... Actually, since we started talking about standards, Gecko ... SGML-based HTML. ...
  • Re: OT: HTML Problem -- anyone help?
    ... so I'll just change the URLs to use "%E7" instead of the HTML ... computer-related material is almost always unaware of international standards and languages other than standard American English. ... And if you don't see the symbol, change your character encoding ...
  • Re: How does Alexa and other sites create "screen shots" of sites?
    ... HTML 4.01 Specification ... supported standards, etc. ... it is not a good browser. ...