Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?
From: George Greene (greeneg_at_greeneg-cs.cs.unc.edu)
Date: 12/26/03
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Previous message: George Greene: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- In reply to: Arturo Magidin: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Next in thread: *** T. Winter: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 26 Dec 2003 15:36:06 -0500
magidin@math.berkeley.edu (Arturo Magidin) writes:
: I don't really see how to do this. Do you know that every computable
: number has an infinite number of digits? If not, how do you know that
: f^{-1}(j) (i.e., the j-th computable number) has at least j digits, so
: that you can define a new number whose j-th digit is different from
: the j-th digit of f^{-1}(j)?
It's a lot worse than that; he didn't originally know what he meant by
"number"; by itself, "number" is simply too vague.
If he meant "real number" then he really was obligated to SAY that.
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Previous message: George Greene: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- In reply to: Arturo Magidin: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Next in thread: *** T. Winter: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]