Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?
From: Russell Easterly (logiclab_at_comcast.net)
Date: 12/27/03
- Next message: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- In reply to: mitch: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Next in thread: mitch: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Reply: mitch: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 16:03:49 -0800
"mitch" <mitchs@rcnNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:3FEBCCD0.D42A0709@rcnNOSPAM.com...
>
> I submit that Surygin's research on e-sets might have some answers for
> you.
>
> :-)
>
> mitch
>
Thanks.
Now, I'm really scared.
:-)
Russell
- Zeno was right. Motion is impossible.
- Next message: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- In reply to: mitch: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Next in thread: mitch: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Reply: mitch: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]