Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?
From: |-|erc (trymyform_at_wwwadamskingdom.com)
Date: 12/27/03
- Next message: Pento: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Previous message: mitch: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- In reply to: Russell Easterly: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Next in thread: Pento: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 20:47:43 +1000
----------------------------- <^> <(·¿·)> <^> -----------------------------
"Russell Easterly" <logiclab@comcast.net> wrote >
> Let x initally be (0).
> If s has the form 111...111(0) and the length of the initial segment of s
> is longer or equal to the length of the initial segment of x then take the
> initial segment of s, append a 1, and make this new string the initial
> segment of x.
>
> Examples:
>
> s x
> (0) 1(0)*
> 1(0)* 11(0)
> 11(0) 111(0)
>
> Prove that x differs from every member of S.
Isn't x just equal to a different s, note *.
A new number has to be a function of the list, not a single member.
Herc
- Next message: Pento: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Previous message: mitch: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- In reply to: Russell Easterly: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Next in thread: Pento: "Re: Cardinality of Set of Computable Numbers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|