Re: Is this automata universal?
From: Andre (sky4walk_at_gmx.de)
Date: 12/30/03
- Next message: Torben Ęgidius Mogensen: "Re: Is this automata universal?"
- Previous message: Pento: "Re: strongly connected graph"
- In reply to: Siamak: "Re: Is this automata universal?"
- Next in thread: Torben Ęgidius Mogensen: "Re: Is this automata universal?"
- Reply: Torben Ęgidius Mogensen: "Re: Is this automata universal?"
- Reply: Siamak: "Re: Is this automata universal?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 Dec 2003 02:46:22 -0800
taati@dpir.com (Siamak) wrote in message news:<cf89d01f.0312292246.2ae10c26@posting.google.com>...
> Andre wrote:
> > you have a stack and you take the first symbol, delete it and put
> > 0,1,2 symbols at the end of the stack.
>
> Could you explain more what you mean?
e.g. you have a stack like this
c
b
a
and the following rules (add 0,1,2 symbols)
a->bc
b->c
c->
than the stack machine works like that
c
c b c
b c b c
a -> b -> c -> b -> ...
it deletes the symbol from the bottom of the stack and put the new
symbols at the top of the stack.
So, is this machine universal?
Thanks
André Betz
- Next message: Torben Ęgidius Mogensen: "Re: Is this automata universal?"
- Previous message: Pento: "Re: strongly connected graph"
- In reply to: Siamak: "Re: Is this automata universal?"
- Next in thread: Torben Ęgidius Mogensen: "Re: Is this automata universal?"
- Reply: Torben Ęgidius Mogensen: "Re: Is this automata universal?"
- Reply: Siamak: "Re: Is this automata universal?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|