Re: TM Tape is Always Finite
From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG (tb+usenet_at_becket.net)
Date: 01/03/04
 Previous message: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: TM Tape is Always Finite"
 In reply to: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: TM Tape is Always Finite"
 Next in thread: Leonard Blackburn: "Re: TM Tape is Always Finite"
 Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 02 Jan 2004 21:44:29 0800
"Arthur J. O'Dwyer" <ajo@nospam.andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
> I can easily understand how some people don't "get" infinity. I
> myself still don't quite "get" ordinal numbers, although I've got
> the cardinals down pretty well now. :)
Eek. I find the ordinals far more comprehensible than cardinals;
maybe I've done too much set theory.
Thomas
 Previous message: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: TM Tape is Always Finite"
 In reply to: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: TM Tape is Always Finite"
 Next in thread: Leonard Blackburn: "Re: TM Tape is Always Finite"
 Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
