union of non-re sets
From: Alex (alexk_at_mailinator.com)
Date: 01/17/04
- Next message: Gary Nastrasio: "Algorithm Running Time"
- Previous message: Andrew Thompson: "Re: Mars Rover Controlled By Java"
- Next in thread: Gary Nastrasio: "Re: union of non-re sets"
- Reply: Gary Nastrasio: "Re: union of non-re sets"
- Reply: Jón Fairbairn: "Re: union of non-re sets"
- Reply: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: union of non-re sets"
- Reply: Siamak: "Re: union of non-re sets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 17 Jan 2004 08:16:18 -0800
Hi,
I was wondering,
Is there a possibility that a union two non-re sets, will give a
(non-recursive) re set ?
Or it is impossible, since intuitively, when you do union you just
make them "bigger", and do no minimize the thing that makes them
non-re ?
Thanks,
Alex
- Next message: Gary Nastrasio: "Algorithm Running Time"
- Previous message: Andrew Thompson: "Re: Mars Rover Controlled By Java"
- Next in thread: Gary Nastrasio: "Re: union of non-re sets"
- Reply: Gary Nastrasio: "Re: union of non-re sets"
- Reply: Jón Fairbairn: "Re: union of non-re sets"
- Reply: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: union of non-re sets"
- Reply: Siamak: "Re: union of non-re sets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]