Re: Converter TM -> Rule110
From: Kent Paul Dolan (xanthian_at_well.com)
Date: 03/05/04
- Next message: Craig Feinstein: "Re: P, NP and coNP"
- Previous message: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: P, NP and coNP"
- In reply to: André Betz: "Converter TM -> Rule110"
- Next in thread: André Betz: "Re: Converter TM -> Rule110"
- Reply: André Betz: "Re: Converter TM -> Rule110"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:33:58 +0000 (UTC)
"André Betz" <mail@andrebetz.de> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have written a converter in Java which converts from a Turing Machine
> description to CA Rule 110 configuration.
> http://www.andrebetz.de/TuringMachine.zip
> so if you are interested feel free to download this file.
Does that in and of itself provide a proof that rule 110
supports Turing complete computation? It should, I would think.
xanthian.
-- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Next message: Craig Feinstein: "Re: P, NP and coNP"
- Previous message: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: P, NP and coNP"
- In reply to: André Betz: "Converter TM -> Rule110"
- Next in thread: André Betz: "Re: Converter TM -> Rule110"
- Reply: André Betz: "Re: Converter TM -> Rule110"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading