Re: How is this collection called?
From: Timothy J. Bruce (uniblab_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 04/08/04
- Next message: Jim Nastos: "Re: all paths between 2 nodes"
- Previous message: Jim Nastos: "Re: all paths between 2 nodes"
- In reply to: Laconic2: "Re: How is this collection called?"
- Next in thread: Laconic2: "Re: How is this collection called?"
- Reply: Laconic2: "Re: How is this collection called?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 8 Apr 2004 11:06:11 -0700
Laconic2 et al:
I find that most interesting. I'll look into it, but it would seem at
face value the Laws of Form may be `The Right Track', although I think
I will continue to rely on Whitehead's `stopgap' since, like Newton's
theory of gravity, it still works in a post Einsteinian era for the
non-particle-physicist. Very interesting indeed.
Thanks for the tip,
Timothy J. Bruce
uniblab@hotmail.com
</RANT>
- Next message: Jim Nastos: "Re: all paths between 2 nodes"
- Previous message: Jim Nastos: "Re: all paths between 2 nodes"
- In reply to: Laconic2: "Re: How is this collection called?"
- Next in thread: Laconic2: "Re: How is this collection called?"
- Reply: Laconic2: "Re: How is this collection called?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|